No Mass Surveillance Flock Watch
Work in progress. We're actively filling in dates, quotes, and sources on this timeline — anything marked "Needs source" is a lead we haven't nailed down yet, not a settled fact. The research on this page is AI-assisted: every claim is checked against a cited source, and source material is included wherever possible, but mistakes can still slip through. If you spot an error, email contact@nosurveillancepledge.com and we'll correct it.

Flock Watch

Richmond

Richmond has the most turbulent Flock story in the county so far: a program that grew fast, got shut down entirely by an incoming police chief after a hidden “national lookup” setting exposed the city’s data to outside agencies, then came back online under a split 4-3 council vote — with a lawsuit threat, a leaked Flock sales playbook, and ongoing disagreement over whether the system’s own crime stats hold up.

  1. Contract February 2023 (exact date not yet confirmed) Needs source

    City Council approves the first Flock contract

    The Richmond City Council approved a contract with Flock Safety to install automated license plate reader cameras at locations around the city. We haven’t yet found the underlying staff report or resolution with the exact date, dollar amount, or initial camera count — the reporting that documents this program’s early months only refers back to “a contract… in February.”

    Sources & documents (1)
  2. Installation April 2023 – May 2023

    First cameras go live — 26 up in 16 locations within weeks

    Flock’s cameras were physically installed starting in April 2023. By the time Chief Bisa French briefed the Council roughly a month later, 26 cameras had been installed in 16 locations around the city, concentrated in areas with shootings and other violent crime, with four more cameras planned. French credited the system with helping locate a stolen wheelchair-accessible van and an armed subject seen driving off with a rifle.

  3. Council Tuesday, November 7, 2023

    Council unanimously approves 70 more ALPR cameras and 40 PTZ cameras

    With Councilmembers Claudia Jimenez and Melvin Willis absent, the Council unanimously approved the installation of over 100 additional cameras — 70 more automatic license plate readers and 40 pan-tilt-zoom cameras. Vice Mayor Gayle McLaughlin’s substitute motion to approve only the PTZ cameras and study the ALPR expansion’s effectiveness first failed; she then voted for the full package anyway, while raising civil-liberties concerns Richmond Police Chief Bisa French and Councilmember Cesar Zepeda pushed back on directly (French: camera counts track geographic area, not population; Zepeda: residents have no reasonable expectation of privacy in public). Ten of the new cameras were earmarked for the 23rd Street corridor, after a double homicide there the previous month.

  4. Contract Tuesday, January 28, 2025

    Council approves a $1M expansion — drones, gunshot detection, a fusion center — 4-3

    The Council approved a $1 million amendment to the Flock contract, bringing the total to $2.03 million through February 2026. It added drone-as-first-responder capability, gunshot detection, “screeching tire” sideshow detection, two mobile CCTV trailers, and a Flock OS fusion center letting police monitor all cameras from one secure location. Councilmembers Jamelia Brown, Cesar Zepeda, Doria Robinson, and Soheila Bana voted yes; Mayor Eduardo Martinez and Councilmembers Claudia Jimenez and Sue Wilson — all Richmond Progressive Alliance members, which had just lost its council majority — voted no, citing sanctuary-policy concerns about the new technology.

  5. Access February 2025

    A hidden "national lookup" feature is found — and the discovery goes nowhere

    A non-sworn RPD employee was notified directly by Flock that an administrative “national lookup” feature was active on Richmond’s system — a two-way setting that, unknown to the city, made Richmond’s plate data searchable by outside agencies nationwide, not just the reverse. The employee had it disabled immediately and reported it to a supervisor, who apparently retired without passing the information up the chain of command. Per Chief Timothy Simmons, the feature had actually been live since the cameras first came online in early 2023 — meaning Richmond’s data was nationally searchable for roughly two years before anyone at the city knew.

    Sources & documents (2)
  6. Control Late November 2025 (Chief Simmons' own account puts it roughly two weeks before the Dec. 9, 2025 disclosure)

    Incoming Chief Simmons learns of the exposure and shuts the whole system down

    Newly named Chief Timothy Simmons — announced days earlier as successor to outgoing Chief Bisa French — learned of the national lookup exposure and immediately shut the ALPR system off completely, then notified the City Council. Flock’s video-surveillance cameras (which don’t compile plate data) and other Flock technology stayed online; only the ALPR system went dark.

  7. Comms December 9, 2025

    RPD goes public with the shutdown

    Richmond police issued a press release confirming the ALPR shutdown, stating there was no evidence any outside agency had actually accessed or misused the exposed data. Councilmember Sue Wilson, who’d voted against the January 2025 expansion specifically over this risk, told Richmondside she had no special expertise — “I just have no confidence that the Flock corporation is going to keep this information private… I knew this not because I’m some kind of security expert but because I googled Flock.”

  8. Council Tuesday, March 17, 2026 — City Council meeting

    Council votes 4-3 to reinstate the cameras through the end of 2026

    After a nearly three-month shutdown and a divided public hearing — pro-Flock speakers including some later accused from the floor of being paid by the company, and public-safety-reform advocates from Reimagine Richmond opposed — the Council voted 4-3 to reactivate Flock’s ALPR system under a short-term contract running through December 31, 2026. Jamelia Brown, Soheila Bana, Cesar Zepeda, and Vice Mayor Doria Robinson voted yes; Mayor Eduardo Martinez and Councilmembers Claudia Jimenez and Sue Wilson voted no. Vice Mayor Robinson, who ultimately voted to restore the cameras, called Flock’s failure to disclose the national-lookup exposure “disingenuous” and said it “makes you a company that is not trustworthy,” while separately arguing that Richmond going dark while neighboring cities kept their systems on made the city “a black hole” that could invite more crime, not less. Chief Simmons attributed a year-over-year rise in vehicle thefts to the shutdown; Councilmember Wilson disputed that read of the crime data as cherry-picked. Flock’s western region public affairs manager, Lily Ho, denied paying pro-Flock public commenters despite a resident citing a radio interview in which one of them said Flock paid him “for my time.”

  9. Comms April 30, 2026

    An attorney threatens to sue, citing 2,700+ out-of-state agencies with data access

    Ahead of the March 17 vote, attorney Brian Hofer submitted a letter to the Council stating that public-records requests showed Richmond police may have shared license plate data with more than 2,700 out-of-state agencies, potentially violating California law restricting such sharing — and said he intends to sue Richmond the way his firm is already litigating against neighboring jurisdictions. Flock’s Paris Lewbel said the company doesn’t share data with ICE and would “vigorously defend” any claims. Chief Simmons separately told the Council that between April 2023 and November 2025 the system contributed to 274 arrests and helped recover 259 stolen vehicles.

  10. Comms August 14, 2026

    Leaked Flock sales training cites Richmond as a model for winning over skeptical cities

    404 Media obtained a Flock Safety internal training guide, used in a May 2026 webinar coaching law enforcement agencies on persuading city leaders to adopt Flock, that held up Richmond and Oakland as success stories — the same period Richmond’s own council was openly split on the technology. The guide advises police to “own the narrative before someone else does,” reframing mass-surveillance concerns rather than avoiding the term. Flock declined to comment on the story; a company spokesperson told Richmondside’s sister outlet the webinar was for public safety agencies only and shared no secret information.

Know something we don't?

If you live in or near Richmond and have an update, a correction, or context worth adding — a FOIA response, council document, email, public statement, or just something you noticed or heard about that isn't reflected here — send it to contact@nosurveillancepledge.com with dates and a link or scan where you can, and we'll add it with a source.