No Mass Surveillance Flock Watch
Work in progress. We're actively filling in dates, quotes, and sources on this timeline — anything marked "Needs source" is a lead we haven't nailed down yet, not a settled fact. The research on this page is AI-assisted: every claim is checked against a cited source, and source material is included wherever possible, but mistakes can still slip through. If you spot an error, email contact@nosurveillancepledge.com and we'll correct it.

Flock Watch

Orinda

Orinda is a growth story, not a removal story — and an unusual one on this site: most of its camera network isn’t run by the city at all. ALPR cameras first went up here in 2015, well before Flock existed as a company; residents themselves, not the police department, drove the network’s more recent expansion, self-funding Flock cameras after a wave of burglaries and then asking the city to take over the bill. The council said yes, and added 15 more cameras on its own account at the same meeting.

  1. Installation By early 2016 — origin (pre-Flock)

    Orinda's ALPR program predates Flock by two years

    Orinda’s police department brought in its first surveillance and license-plate-reader cameras in 2015, under then-Chief Mark Nagel — a year before Flock Safety was founded, meaning this early system almost certainly ran a different vendor (not independently confirmed which one in this research pass). Nagel told CBS/KCBS “the police department’s solve rate of solving crimes was not an acceptable level to me” and that the cameras were meant to deter burglaries as much as solve them. By February 2016, the department credited the system with providing a key tip that led to the arrest of a suspect in connection with a brutal home invasion robbery that happened in December and was adding eight more cameras plus a cruiser-mounted reader.

  2. Installation By Tuesday, May 6, 2025 (reported same day)

    A Knickerbocker neighborhood, fed up with burglaries, buys its own 2 Flock cameras

    Dreyer said his home in Orinda was broken into in January 2024, and rather than wait on the city, Knickerbocker neighborhood resident Evan Dreyer emailed his neighbors about pooling money for their own license-plate cameras. Within days, 30 families signed on, and they installed 2 Flock cameras at the main entrances to the neighborhood at a cost of a little over $11,000 for a two-year contract, about $400 per family — confirming Flock specifically as the vendor for this part of Orinda’s network, distinct from the city’s older, pre-Flock system. This wasn’t unique to Knickerbocker: the city had a total of 19 cameras at this point, and of those only 7 were installed by the city itself — the other 12 came from neighborhood groups or HOAs. EFF’s Karen Gullo raised the standard concern about a privately-initiated network that still feeds police: “What is the information being used for? And why is it OK for people’s license plates to be captured indiscriminately by law enforcement when people driving down the road are really not breaking any laws?” CBS News Bay Area sought comment from the mayor’s office and the police chief for this story; per the outlet, both refused the interview requests.

  3. Council Tuesday, May 6, 2025 — City Council meeting

    Council approves 15 more cameras the same night, on top of taking over Knickerbocker's

    At the same Tuesday meeting, the City Council approved a proposal to buy 15 extra cameras — on top of the 19 already installed, with the physical equipment/installation cost estimated around $55,000 and an annual cost near $45,000, per contemporaneous preview reporting. The request originated with the 30 Knickerbocker residents who’d committed to splitting a $5,000-a-year bill for their own two solar-powered cameras, asking the city to take over that cost. Dreyer framed the episode as a model for public-private cooperation rather than a workaround: “I think it’s been incredibly inspiring to see members of the community come together, support each other, support our police. This is an investment of public safety.” Police Chief Anthony Rossi spoke in support, pitching an additional use case beyond crime-solving: “These types of cameras will be instrumental in an evacuation,” citing the ability to route emergency resources around traffic incidents. No opposing testimony or dissenting vote is captured in either source used for this entry — unlike most other cities in this project, Orinda’s expansion appears to have proceeded with little organized pushback.

Know something we don't?

If you live in or near Orinda and have an update, a correction, or context worth adding — a FOIA response, council document, email, public statement, or just something you noticed or heard about that isn't reflected here — send it to contact@nosurveillancepledge.com with dates and a link or scan where you can, and we'll add it with a source.