Antioch
Antioch runs a Flock Safety program, but there’s no public record of when it started, what it cost, or how many cameras exist — no council vote, staff report, or contract has surfaced anywhere in the city’s own agenda archive. What we do have is a records request that caught the department denying it shares data with out-of-state agencies, even after being handed the specific out-of-state agencies to check, and a civilian oversight commission that went over a year without a substantive Flock briefing. This is a thin timeline because the record is thin — that’s itself part of the story.
-
A records request names three out-of-state agencies — Antioch PD says none exist
Syd Jones filed a public-records request with Antioch PD (via MuckRock, request #25-518) asking for three specific entries from Antioch’s own Flock Network Audit, identifying the requesting officers by name, their agencies (Miami-Dade FL SO, Palos Heights IL PD, Marshall County AL SO), and exact search timestamps between December 2024 and January 2025. On November 13, 2025, Police Records Supervisor Amanda Nelson replied: “We do not share ALPR info with out of state agencies. Therefore, there are no responsive documents.”
Jones followed up on November 19, pointing to contemporaneous reporting on other California police departments unknowingly sharing Flock data with out-of-state and federal agencies, and asked the department to actually pull the Network Audit CSV for the date range and search it by timestamp rather than rely on a general policy statement.
After a February 17, 2026 follow-up from MuckRock staff, the department closed the request on February 23, 2026 reaffirming the same November 13 answer verbatim, without indicating whether the CSV was ever searched.
-
A year and a half in, Flock still hasn't had its own briefing
At the Antioch Police Oversight Commission’s May 18, 2026 regular meeting, “Flock Data Update” appears only on the list of upcoming/future agenda items — meaning that as of this date, the commission tasked with civilian oversight of the police department had not yet received any substantive presentation on the city’s Flock program, months after the MuckRock request above had already surfaced questions about it.
-
Chief's presentation names a "Flock Transparency Portal" — no numbers attached
Three months later, the police chief’s “2026 at a Glance” presentation to the Police Oversight Commission listed a “Flock Transparency Portal” among the year’s initiatives — the first acknowledgment of the Flock program in the civilian oversight record. The slide names it alongside unrelated items (a substation opening, a “Blue Envelope Program”) with no camera count, contract value, retention policy, or portal link included in the packet itself.
-
The first real numbers: 185 cameras, 13 Flock, 29 Vigilant/Motorola — and an April 2023 program start date
This closes most of the gap flagged above. In an October 2025 presentation to the City Council, Lt. Whitaker of APD’s investigations bureau disclosed that there are a total of 185 cameras between the city’s general video-surveillance system and its automated license plate readers, spread across four separate budgets. Of the ALPR-specific cameras, they have 13 FLOCK cameras — installed within the prior six months, i.e. roughly early-to-mid 2025 — alongside 29 vigilant cameras, 7 which are offline, leaving 22 active and working (Vigilant Solutions, the ALPR line Motorola Solutions acquired and now operates).
Per a companion Contra Costa News item on the same presentation, ALPR data has been in use since its inception in April 2023 — the first documented start date for Antioch’s ALPR program found in this research pass.
Whitaker also told the council the department does not share this data with out-of-state or federal agencies, and that with 7 of the 29 Vigilant units offline, the department planned to replace them with Flock units as they fail, budget permitting — effectively already underway, a year before the Axon consolidation proposal below.
-
Council to consider a $661,687.54 sole-source Axon deal, consolidating Flock and Motorola into one system
The Antioch Police Department’s staff report to the City Council recommends the city adopt a resolution… for a 49-month term beginning October 1, 2026, in an amount not to exceed $661,687.54 for a sole-source agreement with Axon Enterprise covering 55 fixed ALPR locations (38 beginning in 2026, 17 more in 2027), six additional Axon Fleet 3 in-car/mobile ALPR systems, and 120 Axon AI Assistant licenses. The report states plainly that Motorola is decommissioning its ALPR platform, forcing the consolidation — this is a vendor-driven replacement, not primarily a department-initiated expansion, though the result is still 38 Axon Outpost locations beginning immediately, more than double the 13 Flock units confirmed in October 2025 above.
On governance, the report states the existing ALPR policy carries forward unchanged: access stays logged and auditable, and APD does not share or provide access to ALPR data with federal or out-of-state agencies, citing the California Values Act (SB 54) — consistent with what the department told Syd Jones’s records request above, though that request never confirmed the underlying audit logs were actually searched. The sole-source justification: staff recommends sole source procurement to standardize on the Axon platform APD already uses for body-worn cameras and evidence management, under Antioch Municipal Code section 3-4.12(B), which permits sole source purchasing for unique, proprietary, or specific-design goods.
The staff report’s own cited crime-reduction evidence is drawn entirely from other agencies (Berkeley, South San Francisco, Piedmont, San Francisco, and a peer-reviewed Atlantic City study) — it does not cite any outcome data from Antioch’s own existing Flock or Vigilant cameras, or from any comparison agency within Contra Costa County, a gap Contra Costa News flagged explicitly in its own coverage.
Sources & documents (1)
Know something we don't?
If you live in or near Antioch and have an update, a correction, or context worth adding — a FOIA response, council document, email, public statement, or just something you noticed or heard about that isn't reflected here — send it to contact@nosurveillancepledge.com with dates and a link or scan where you can, and we'll add it with a source.